RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Optimal Traders vs E8 Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OPTM

Optimal Traders

E8FD

E8 Funding

EST. 2021

OPTIMAL TRADERS

METRIC

E8 FUNDING

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$25

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

OPTIMAL TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Futures, Crypto

Optimal Traders PROS

+The firm name implies an optimisation-focused approach to trader evaluation and development.
+Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.
+A structured funding model, if present, could support disciplined and performance-driven traders.
+Potential for competitive terms cannot be ruled out without further data disclosure.

Optimal Traders CONS

−No data whatsoever has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
−Traders cannot make any informed decisions without full disclosure of this firm's core terms and conditions.

E8 Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Optimal Traders

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH OPTM