RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OFP Funding vs Monevis Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OFPF
OFP Funding
EST. 2021
MNVF
Monevis Funding
EST. 2024
OFP FUNDING
METRIC
MONEVIS FUNDING
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
$150
MIN COST
2d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradingView

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static

OFP Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
  • +News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Monevis Funding PROS

  • +Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
  • +Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
  • +No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
  • +No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

  • Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
  • No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
  • Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OFP Funding
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
Monevis Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

OFP Funding Full Review →Monevis Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy