OFP Funding vs FXIFY

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
+News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

+Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
+Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
+EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
−Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

OFP Funding

Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

FXIFY

Lower trust score (53/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.