RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OFP Funding vs FuturesElite

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OFPF

OFP Funding

EST. 2021

FTEL

FuturesElite

OFP FUNDING

METRIC

FUTURESELITE

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—59/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—4/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER100%

$200,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$150,000

$150—

MIN COST

BETTER$79

2d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

1TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE1

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradingView

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas

OFP Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
+News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

FuturesElite PROS

+Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

FuturesElite CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
−No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OFP Funding

Higher trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OFPF