RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OFP Funding vs Fidelcrest

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OFPF
OFP Funding
EST. 2021
FDLC
Fidelcrest
OFP FUNDING
METRIC
FIDELCREST
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
$150
MIN COST
2d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradingView

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

OFP Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
  • +News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Fidelcrest PROS

  • +Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

  • No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
  • Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
  • Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT

OFP Funding
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
Fidelcrest
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

OFP Funding Full Review →Fidelcrest Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy