RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OFP Funding vs Bulenox

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OFPF
OFP Funding
EST. 2021
Bulenox
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
OFP FUNDING
METRIC
BULENOX
60/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER71/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$150—
MIN COST
BETTER$99
2dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradingView

BULENOX DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures

OFP Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
  • +News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Bulenox PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

Bulenox CONS

  • −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OFP Funding
Lower trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
Bulenox
Higher trust score (71/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

OFP Funding Full Review →Bulenox Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy