RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OFP Funding vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OFPF

OFP Funding

EST. 2021

BLGD

Blue Guardian

OFP FUNDING

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—55/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—3/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$150

MIN COST

—

2dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

—

1TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE1

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradingView

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS: 3-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

OFP Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
+News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Blue Guardian PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
+Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
+Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

−Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
−No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

OFP Funding

Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OFPF