RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
OFP Funding vs Audacity Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
OFPF
OFP Funding
EST. 2021
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
OFP FUNDING
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
60/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE60/100
3.5/5TIE
RATING
TIE3.5/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$150—
MIN COST
BETTER$42
2d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
OFP FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradingView
AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
OFP Funding PROS
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
- +News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.
OFP Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
Audacity Capital PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
- +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.
Audacity Capital CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
- −Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy