RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OFP Funding vs ATFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OFPF
OFP Funding
EST. 2021
ATFD
ATFunded
OFP FUNDING
METRIC
ATFUNDED
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$150
MIN COST
BETTER$49
2dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradingView

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

OFP Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
  • +News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OFP Funding
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
ATFunded
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

OFP Funding Full Review →ATFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy