RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
OFP Funding vs ATFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
OFPF
OFP Funding
EST. 2021
ATFD
ATFunded
OFP FUNDING
METRIC
ATFUNDED
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$150—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
2dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
OFP FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradingView
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
OFP Funding PROS
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
- +News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.
OFP Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy