RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Nino Options vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

NINO
Nino Options
LCDT
Lucid Trading
NINO OPTIONS
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
—
—
MIN COST
$90
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

NINO OPTIONS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

Nino Options PROS

  • +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
  • +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
  • +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
  • +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

Nino Options CONS

  • −Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
  • −Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
  • −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

Nino Options
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Nino Options Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy