RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Nordic Funder vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

NFND

Nordic Funder

EST. 2022

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

NORDIC FUNDER

METRIC

SAVIUS

69/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$59BETTER

MIN COST

—$285

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

NORDIC FUNDER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

Nordic Funder PROS

+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly alternatives
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility
+Both MT4 and MT5 are supported, covering the most widely used retail trading platforms

Nordic Funder CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Nordic Funder

Higher trust score (69/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

START WITH NFND