RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Nordic Funder vs Matrix Executions

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

NFND

Nordic Funder

EST. 2022

MTRX

Matrix Executions

EST. 2018

NORDIC FUNDER

METRIC

MATRIX EXECUTIONS

69/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$59

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

NORDIC FUNDER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Nordic Funder PROS

+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly alternatives
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility
+Both MT4 and MT5 are supported, covering the most widely used retail trading platforms

Nordic Funder CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer

Matrix Executions PROS

+Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
−Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Nordic Funder

Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

START WITH NFND