RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Nordic Funder vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Nordic Funder
NFND
Nordic Funder
EST. 2022
Apex Trader Funding
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
NORDIC FUNDER
METRIC
APEX TRADER FUNDING
69/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
61/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$59
MIN COST
BETTER$35
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
8d
PASS RATE
31%
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

NORDIC FUNDER DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, large-cap

Nordic Funder PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly alternatives
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility
  • +Both MT4 and MT5 are supported, covering the most widely used retail trading platforms

Nordic Funder CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer

Apex Trader Funding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

  • Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
  • Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Nordic Funder
Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Apex Trader Funding
Lower trust score (61/100). Slower payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Nordic Funder Full Review →Apex Trader Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy