RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Matrix Executions vs The Trading Pit Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MTRX
Matrix Executions
EST. 2018
TTPF
The Trading Pit Futures
MATRIX EXECUTIONS
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
MAX FUNDING
MIN COST
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Matrix Executions PROS

  • +Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

  • Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
  • Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

The Trading Pit Futures PROS

  • +Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
  • +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
  • +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

The Trading Pit Futures CONS

  • Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
  • Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
  • Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Matrix Executions
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.
The Trading Pit Futures
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Matrix Executions Full Review →The Trading Pit Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy