RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Matrix Executions vs Quadeye

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MTRX
Matrix Executions
EST. 2018
QDEY
Quadeye
MATRIX EXECUTIONS
METRIC
QUADEYE
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
MAX FUNDING
MIN COST
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

QUADEYE DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Matrix Executions PROS

  • +Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

  • Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
  • Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

Quadeye PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

Quadeye CONS

  • No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
  • India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory complexity for international traders
  • Absence of data on profit split, funding, drawdown, or payouts limits trader confidence

PROPDNA VERDICT

Matrix Executions
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.
Quadeye
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Matrix Executions Full Review →Quadeye Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy