RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Matrix Executions vs FuturesElite

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MTRX

Matrix Executions

EST. 2018

FTEL

FuturesElite

MATRIX EXECUTIONS

METRIC

FUTURESELITE

46/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

4.2/5BETTER

RATING

—4/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

100%

—

MAX FUNDING

$150,000

—

MIN COST

$79

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—1

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas

Matrix Executions PROS

+Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
−Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

FuturesElite PROS

+Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

FuturesElite CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
−No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Matrix Executions

Lower trust score (46/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH MTRX