RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Matrix Executions vs Funded Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MTRX
Matrix Executions
EST. 2018
FNDT
Funded Traders
MATRIX EXECUTIONS
METRIC
FUNDED TRADERS
46/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
40/100
4.2/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
MAX FUNDING
$600,000
MIN COST
$489
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
2BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

Matrix Executions PROS

  • +Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

  • Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
  • Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

Funded Traders PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
  • +News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
  • +Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
  • Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Matrix Executions
Higher trust score (46/100). Faster payouts at —d.
Funded Traders
Lower trust score (40/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Matrix Executions Full Review →Funded Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy