RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Matrix Executions vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MTRX

Matrix Executions

EST. 2018

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

MATRIX EXECUTIONS

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

46/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

4.2/5BETTER

RATING

—4/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$250,000

—

MIN COST

$81

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—1

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

Matrix Executions PROS

+Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
−Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Matrix Executions

Lower trust score (46/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH MTRX