RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Matrix Executions vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MTRX
Matrix Executions
EST. 2018
Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
MATRIX EXECUTIONS
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
46/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
4.2/5
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$79
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
2
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

Matrix Executions PROS

  • +Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

  • Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
  • Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Matrix Executions
Lower trust score (46/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Funderpro
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Matrix Executions Full Review →Funderpro Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy