RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Matrix Executions vs DPFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MTRX

Matrix Executions

EST. 2018

DPFD

DPFunded

MATRIX EXECUTIONS

METRIC

DPFUNDED

46/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—40/100

4.2/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$58

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

DPFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Commodities, Indices

Matrix Executions PROS

+Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
−Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

DPFunded PROS

+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

DPFunded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Matrix Executions

Higher trust score (46/100). Faster payouts at —d.

START WITH MTRX