RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Matrix Executions vs Crypto Fund Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MTRX

Matrix Executions

EST. 2018

CRFT

Crypto Fund Trader

EST. 2022

MATRIX EXECUTIONS

METRIC

CRYPTO FUND TRADER

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$5,000

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

CRYPTO FUND TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5

Matrix Executions PROS

+Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
−Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

Crypto Fund Trader PROS

+Crypto-focused offering provides niche market access unavailable at most prop firms
+Based in Switzerland, a well-regulated and reputable financial hub
+Founded in 2022, indicating an established operational track record
+Offers MT5, a widely used and trusted trading platform

Crypto Fund Trader CONS

−Min challenge cost of $5,000 is vastly higher than the industry average of $186.7
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
−No profit split, drawdown, or profit target data provided, limiting informed comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT