RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Monevis vs Topstep
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
MONEVIS
METRIC
TOPSTEP
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—66/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
85%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$49TIE
MIN COST
TIE$49
7dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE7d
—
PASS RATE
28%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
MONEVIS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex
TOPSTEP DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
Monevis PROS
- +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
- +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.
Monevis CONS
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
- −Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.
Topstep PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
- +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.
Topstep CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy