RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs The Funded Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNVS

Monevis

EST. 2023

TFTR

The Funded Trader

MONEVIS

METRIC

THE FUNDED TRADER

68/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

85%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$600,000

$49BETTER

MIN COST

—$489

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
PLATFORMS: MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader

Monevis PROS

+Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
+On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
−Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

The Funded Trader PROS

+News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
+Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
+Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
+Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.

The Funded Trader CONS

−Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
−Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis

Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH MNVS