RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs Pip Traders Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNVS

Monevis

EST. 2023

PTFD

Pip Traders Funding

MONEVIS

METRIC

PIP TRADERS FUNDING

58/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—40/100

3.14/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

85%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

3BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Monevis PROS

+Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
+On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
−Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

Pip Traders Funding PROS

+The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
+A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
+Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
+Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
−Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis

Higher trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH MNVS