RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Monevis
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
LCDT
Lucid Trading
MONEVIS
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$49BETTER
MIN COST
—$90
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

Monevis PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
  • +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

  • −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
  • −Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
  • −Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis
Higher trust score (68/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Lucid Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Monevis Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy