RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNVS

Monevis

EST. 2023

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

MONEVIS

METRIC

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

68/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

85%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Monevis PROS

+Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
+On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
−Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis

Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH MNVS