RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs FXIFY

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Monevis
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
MONEVIS
METRIC
FXIFY
58/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
3.14/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
85%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$400,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$400,000
$49
MIN COST
BETTER$32
7dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE7d
PASS RATE
15%
3BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

Monevis PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
  • +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
  • Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis
Lower trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Monevis Full Review →FXIFY Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy