RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Monevis vs FuturesElite
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
FTEL
FuturesElite
MONEVIS
METRIC
FUTURESELITE
58/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
3.14/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
85%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
—$79
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
3BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—1
MONEVIS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex
FUTURESELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas
Monevis PROS
- +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
- +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.
Monevis CONS
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
- −Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.
FuturesElite PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.
FuturesElite CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
- −No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy