RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs Funded Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Monevis
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
FNDT
Funded Traders
MONEVIS
METRIC
FUNDED TRADERS
58/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
40/100
3.14/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$600,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
$489
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
3BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

Monevis PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
  • +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
  • Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

Funded Traders PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
  • +News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
  • +Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
  • Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis
Higher trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Funded Traders
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Monevis Full Review →Funded Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy