RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs Fidelcrest

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Monevis
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
FDLC
Fidelcrest
MONEVIS
METRIC
FIDELCREST
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$49
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Monevis PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
  • +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

  • −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
  • −Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
  • −Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

Fidelcrest PROS

  • +Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

  • −No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
  • −Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
  • −Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis
Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Fidelcrest
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Monevis Full Review →Fidelcrest Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy