RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNVS

Monevis

EST. 2023

APEX

Apex Trader Funding

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021

MONEVIS

METRIC

APEX TRADER FUNDING

58/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

3.14/5BETTER

RATING

—2.75/5

85%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$400,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$49—

MIN COST

BETTER$35

7dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—8d

—

PASS RATE

31%

3TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE3

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, large-cap

Monevis PROS

+Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
+On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
−Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

Apex Trader Funding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis

Lower trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH MNVS