RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Monevis vs The 5%ers
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
5PRS
The 5%ers
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2016
MONEVIS
METRIC
THE 5%ERS
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—61/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
85%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$400,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$4,000,000
$49—
MIN COST
BETTER$39
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
18%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
MONEVIS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex
THE 5%ERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, advanced
Monevis PROS
- +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
- +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.
Monevis CONS
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
- −Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.
The 5%ers PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272, offering exceptional capital scale
- +Min challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.70, minimising entry costs
- +Profit target of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to pass
The 5%ers CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Pass rate of 18% is very low, indicating the majority of traders fail the evaluation
- −Trailing drawdown type is the most restrictive, shrinking the drawdown buffer as profits grow
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy