RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Monevis
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
OneFunded
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
MONEVIS
METRIC
ONEFUNDED
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
55/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER1/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
$59
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
35%
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

Monevis PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
  • +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
  • Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

OneFunded PROS

  • +No time limits on eval
  • +4 challenge tracks
  • +Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

  • Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
  • Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis
Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
OneFunded
Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Monevis Full Review →OneFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy