RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis Funding vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNVF

Monevis Funding

EST. 2024

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

MONEVIS FUNDING

METRIC

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
DRAWDOWN: Static

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Monevis Funding PROS

+Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
+Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
+No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
+No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

−Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
−No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
−Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT