RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis Funding vs Goat Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNVF
Monevis Funding
EST. 2024
Goat Funded
GOAT
Goat Funded
EST. 2023
MONEVIS FUNDING
METRIC
GOAT FUNDED
41/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER62/100
1.5/5
RATING
BETTER3.43/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
MIN COST
$49
PAYOUT DAYS
2d
PASS RATE
2
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static

GOAT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
TradeLocker, MT5

Monevis Funding PROS

  • +Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
  • +Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
  • +No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
  • +No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

  • Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
  • No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
  • Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

Goat Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

Goat Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis Funding
Lower trust score (41/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Goat Funded
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Monevis Funding Full Review →Goat Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy