RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Monevis Funding vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNVF

Monevis Funding

EST. 2024

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

MONEVIS FUNDING

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

41/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

1.5/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$2,000,000

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE2

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
DRAWDOWN: Static

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Monevis Funding PROS

+Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
+Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
+No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
+No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

−Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
−No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
−Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Monevis Funding

Lower trust score (41/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH MNVF