Monevis Funding vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC	Monevis Funding EST. 2024	Apex Trader Funding ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
TRUST SCORE	41/100	59/100BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT	—	90%
PAYOUT DAYS	—	8d
PASS RATE	—	31%
MIN COST	—	$35
MAX FUNDING	—	$300,000
RATING	1.5/5	2.75/5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT	2	3BETTER
STEPS	—	1-step
DRAWDOWN	Static	Trailing EOD

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

+Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
+Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
+No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
+No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

−Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
−No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
−Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

Monevis Funding

Lower trust score (41/100). Slower payouts at —d.

Apex Trader Funding

Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.