RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Ment Funding vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNTF

Ment Funding

FNDF

FundedFast

MENT FUNDING

METRIC

FUNDEDFAST

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$49

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

MENT FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

Ment Funding PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, giving traders a reference point for discovery
+No restrictive data points provided that could indicate unfavorable terms
+Absence of negative metrics means no confirmed below-average figures
+Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison

Ment Funding CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot make an informed decision without any comparable metrics

FundedFast PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
+Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
+Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
−Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

Ment Funding

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH MNTF