RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Ment Funding vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MNTF

Ment Funding

1FND

OneFunded

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023

MENT FUNDING

METRIC

ONEFUNDED

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER55/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER1/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$59

—

PAYOUT DAYS

14d

—

PASS RATE

35%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

MENT FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

Ment Funding PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, giving traders a reference point for discovery
+No restrictive data points provided that could indicate unfavorable terms
+Absence of negative metrics means no confirmed below-average figures
+Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison

Ment Funding CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot make an informed decision without any comparable metrics

OneFunded PROS

+No time limits on eval
+4 challenge tracks
+Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

−Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
−Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

Ment Funding

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH MNTF