RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

My Funded Futures vs The Trading Pit

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

My Funded Futures
MFFU
My Funded Futures
EST. 2022
The Trading Pit
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
MY FUNDED FUTURES
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT
80/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—74/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$5,000,000
$65BETTER
MIN COST
—$99
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

MY FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, DeepChart
TYPES
futures

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

My Funded Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the funded threshold easier to reach.
  • +Wide platform support includes TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, and DeepChart.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

My Funded Futures CONS

  • −Days to first payout at 14 days is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting position management across market closures.

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

PROPDNA VERDICT

My Funded Futures
Higher trust score (80/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
The Trading Pit
Lower trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

My Funded Futures Full Review →The Trading Pit Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy