RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
My Funded Futures vs The Funded Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MFFU
My Funded Futures
EST. 2022
TFTR
The Funded Trader
MY FUNDED FUTURES
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
80/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$600,000
$65BETTER
MIN COST
—$489
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
MY FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, DeepChart
- TYPES
- futures
THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader
My Funded Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the funded threshold easier to reach.
- +Wide platform support includes TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, and DeepChart.
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.
My Funded Futures CONS
- −Days to first payout at 14 days is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting position management across market closures.
The Funded Trader PROS
- +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
- +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
- +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.
The Funded Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
- −Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.
PROPDNA VERDICT
My Funded Futures
Higher trust score (80/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy