My Funded Futures vs Trading Cult
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | My Funded Futures EST. 2023 | Trading Cult EST. 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 64/100BETTER | 54/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%BETTER | 80% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 1dBETTER | 14d |
| MIN COST | $109 | $107BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $150,000 | $200,000BETTER |
| RATING | 5/5TIE | 5/5TIE |
| REVIEW COUNT | 2BETTER | 1 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | EOD Trailing | Trailing |
MY FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower
- TYPES
- futures
TRADING CULT DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- Fast Payout, Instant Funding
My Funded Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
- +Single evaluation step beats the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
- +Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
- +Phase 1 profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms.
My Funded Futures CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is well below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
- −Min challenge cost of $109 is above the average of $69.4 across listed firms.
- −Overall drawdown of 4% EOD trailing is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room before a breach.
Trading Cult PROS
- +Overall drawdown allowance of 8% exceeds the listed-firms average of 7.9%, giving traders slightly more room.
- +Single-step evaluation is below the listed-firms average of 1.6 steps, reaching funded faster.
- +News trading is permitted, allowing traders to hold positions through high-volatility events.
- +Three platform options (MT4, MT5, cTrader) provide flexibility across popular trading environments.
Trading Cult CONS
- −Minimum challenge cost of $107 is above the listed-firms average of $69.4, making entry more expensive.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the listed-firms average of 83.2%, reducing trader earnings.
- −Maximum funding of $200,000 is below the listed-firms average of $310,294.1, capping earning potential.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Risk
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy