RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

My Funded Futures vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

My Funded Futures
MFFU
My Funded Futures
EST. 2022
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
MY FUNDED FUTURES
METRIC
SAVIUS
80/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$65BETTER
MIN COST
$285
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

MY FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, DeepChart
TYPES
futures

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

My Funded Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the funded threshold easier to reach.
  • +Wide platform support includes TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, and DeepChart.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

My Funded Futures CONS

  • Days to first payout at 14 days is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting position management across market closures.

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

My Funded Futures
Higher trust score (80/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Savius
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

My Funded Futures Full Review →Savius Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy