RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

My Funded Futures vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MFFU

My Funded Futures

EST. 2022

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

MY FUNDED FUTURES

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

80/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$150,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$250,000

$65BETTER

MIN COST

—$81

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

MY FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, DeepChart
TYPES: futures

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

My Funded Futures PROS

+Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the funded threshold easier to reach.
+Wide platform support includes TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, and DeepChart.
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

My Funded Futures CONS

−Days to first payout at 14 days is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting position management across market closures.

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

My Funded Futures

Higher trust score (80/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH MFFU