RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
My Funded Futures vs Funderpro
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MFFU
My Funded Futures
EST. 2022
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
MY FUNDED FUTURES
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
49/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$200,000
$65BETTER
MIN COST
—$79
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3
MY FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, DeepChart
- TYPES
- futures
FUNDERPRO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader
My Funded Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the funded threshold easier to reach.
- +Wide platform support includes TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, and DeepChart.
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.
My Funded Futures CONS
- −Days to first payout at 14 days is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting position management across market closures.
Funderpro PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice
Funderpro CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders
PROPDNA VERDICT
My Funded Futures
Lower trust score (49/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy