RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

MyFlashFunding vs Quadeye

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MFFL
MyFlashFunding
QDEY
Quadeye
MYFLASHFUNDING
METRIC
QUADEYE
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$15
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

MYFLASHFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, Sway Charts

QUADEYE DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

MyFlashFunding PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility for accessing profits.

MyFlashFunding CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −Profit target of 15% is well above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation significantly harder to pass.
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Quadeye PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

Quadeye CONS

  • −No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
  • −India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory complexity for international traders
  • −Absence of data on profit split, funding, drawdown, or payouts limits trader confidence

PROPDNA VERDICT

MyFlashFunding
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Quadeye
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

MyFlashFunding Full Review →Quadeye Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy