RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

MyFlashFunding vs ICFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MFFL
MyFlashFunding
ICFD
ICFunded
MYFLASHFUNDING
METRIC
ICFUNDED
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
56/100
4/5
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$500,000
$15BETTER
MIN COST
$74
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

MYFLASHFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, Sway Charts

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

MyFlashFunding PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility for accessing profits.

MyFlashFunding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Profit target of 15% is well above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation significantly harder to pass.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

MyFlashFunding
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
ICFunded
Lower trust score (56/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

MyFlashFunding Full Review →ICFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy