RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Maven Trading vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Maven Trading
MAVN
Maven Trading
EST. 2022
QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
MAVEN TRADING
METRIC
QT FUNDED
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
64/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER5/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$1,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
$13
MIN COST
BETTER$12
10d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

MAVEN TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Maven Trading PROS

  • +Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.

Maven Trading CONS

  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
  • Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Maven Trading
Higher trust score (68/100). Slower payouts at 10d. 80% profit split.
QT Funded
Lower trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Maven Trading Full Review →QT Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy