RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Maven Trading vs Matrix Executions
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MAVN
Maven Trading
EST. 2022
MTRX
Matrix Executions
EST. 2018
MAVEN TRADING
METRIC
MATRIX EXECUTIONS
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$1,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$13
MIN COST
—
10d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
MAVEN TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Maven Trading PROS
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
Maven Trading CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
- −Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
Matrix Executions PROS
- +Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
Matrix Executions CONS
- −Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
- −Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
- −Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy