RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Maven Trading vs ICFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MAVN
Maven Trading
EST. 2022
ICFD
ICFunded
MAVEN TRADING
METRIC
ICFUNDED
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—56/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$1,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$500,000
$13BETTER
MIN COST
—$74
10dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2
MAVEN TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
ICFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- static
- MARKETS
- forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
- PLATFORMS
- mt5
- TYPES
- forex, futures
Maven Trading PROS
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
Maven Trading CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
- −Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
ICFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
- +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
- +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
- +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.
ICFunded CONS
- −Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
- −Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
- −Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy